See Rankings Below or Click on These Links for More Information: Click Here for the Complete 2002 State Awards Publication | 43 Factors | Methodology | Press Release | |
The 2002 Most Livable State Award |
||||||||||
ALPHA ORDER |
RANK ORDER |
|||||||||
2002 RANK |
STATE |
LIVABILITY RATING |
2001 RANK |
CHANGE |
|
2002 RANK |
STATE |
LIVABILITY RATING |
2001 RANK |
CHANGE |
48 |
Alabama |
18.12 |
46 |
-2 |
1 |
Minnesota |
33.91 |
1 |
0 |
|
28 |
Alaska |
24.86 |
37 |
9 |
2 |
Iowa |
32.26 |
3 |
1 |
|
40 |
Arizona |
21.67 |
36 |
-4 |
3 |
New Hampshire |
31.81 |
13 |
10 |
|
47 |
Arkansas |
18.88 |
44 |
-3 |
4 |
Virginia |
31.47 |
4 |
0 |
|
33 |
California |
23.88 |
32 |
-1 |
5 |
Massachusetts |
30.98 |
9 |
4 |
|
7 |
Colorado |
30.29 |
2 |
-5 |
6 |
Nebraska |
30.84 |
10 |
4 |
|
9 |
Connecticut |
29.63 |
6 |
-3 |
7 |
Colorado |
30.29 |
2 |
-5 |
|
19 |
Delaware |
25.93 |
21 |
2 |
8 |
Wyoming |
29.72 |
12 |
4 |
|
39 |
Florida |
21.95 |
40 |
1 |
9 |
Connecticut |
29.63 |
6 |
-3 |
|
35 |
Georgia |
23.42 |
33 |
-2 |
10 |
New Jersey |
29.60 |
11 |
1 |
|
43 |
Hawaii |
20.53 |
34 |
-9 |
11 |
Wisconsin |
29.37 |
8 |
-3 |
|
21 |
Idaho |
25.56 |
20 |
-1 |
12 |
Utah |
29.07 |
5 |
-7 |
|
31 |
Illinois |
24.00 |
31 |
0 |
13 |
Kansas |
29.02 |
7 |
-6 |
|
20 |
Indiana |
25.79 |
21 |
1 |
13 |
South Dakota |
29.02 |
16 |
3 |
|
2 |
Iowa |
32.26 |
3 |
1 |
15 |
Maine |
28.53 |
17 |
2 |
|
13 |
Kansas |
29.02 |
7 |
-6 |
16 |
North Dakota |
28.23 |
25 |
9 |
|
42 |
Kentucky |
21.07 |
43 |
1 |
17 |
Maryland |
28.09 |
14 |
-3 |
|
49 |
Louisiana |
17.02 |
49 |
0 |
18 |
Vermont |
27.63 |
15 |
-3 |
|
15 |
Maine |
28.53 |
17 |
2 |
19 |
Delaware |
25.93 |
21 |
2 |
|
17 |
Maryland |
28.09 |
14 |
-3 |
20 |
Indiana |
25.79 |
21 |
1 |
|
5 |
Massachusetts |
30.98 |
9 |
4 |
21 |
Idaho |
25.56 |
20 |
-1 |
|
23 |
Michigan |
25.51 |
27 |
4 |
21 |
Washington |
25.56 |
18 |
-3 |
|
1 |
Minnesota |
33.91 |
1 |
0 |
23 |
Michigan |
25.51 |
27 |
4 |
|
50 |
Mississippi |
17.00 |
50 |
0 |
24 |
Pennsylvania |
25.49 |
30 |
6 |
|
26 |
Missouri |
25.37 |
19 |
-7 |
25 |
Ohio |
25.40 |
24 |
-1 |
|
32 |
Montana |
23.98 |
39 |
7 |
26 |
Missouri |
25.37 |
19 |
-7 |
|
6 |
Nebraska |
30.84 |
10 |
4 |
27 |
Oregon |
25.33 |
23 |
-4 |
|
34 |
Nevada |
23.77 |
26 |
-8 |
28 |
Alaska |
24.86 |
37 |
9 |
|
3 |
New Hampshire |
31.81 |
13 |
10 |
29 |
Texas |
24.37 |
29 |
0 |
|
10 |
New Jersey |
29.60 |
11 |
1 |
30 |
Rhode Island |
24.26 |
28 |
-2 |
|
46 |
New Mexico |
19.93 |
47 |
1 |
31 |
Illinois |
24.00 |
31 |
0 |
|
37 |
New York |
22.72 |
35 |
-2 |
32 |
Montana |
23.98 |
39 |
7 |
|
36 |
North Carolina |
22.88 |
42 |
6 |
33 |
California |
23.88 |
32 |
-1 |
|
16 |
North Dakota |
28.23 |
25 |
9 |
34 |
Nevada |
23.77 |
26 |
-8 |
|
25 |
Ohio |
25.40 |
24 |
-1 |
35 |
Georgia |
23.42 |
33 |
-2 |
|
38 |
Oklahoma |
22.60 |
41 |
3 |
36 |
North Carolina |
22.88 |
42 |
6 |
|
27 |
Oregon |
25.33 |
23 |
-4 |
37 |
New York |
22.72 |
35 |
-2 |
|
24 |
Pennsylvania |
25.49 |
30 |
6 |
38 |
Oklahoma |
22.60 |
41 |
3 |
|
30 |
Rhode Island |
24.26 |
28 |
-2 |
39 |
Florida |
21.95 |
40 |
1 |
|
41 |
South Carolina |
21.30 |
38 |
-3 |
40 |
Arizona |
21.67 |
36 |
-4 |
|
13 |
South Dakota |
29.02 |
16 |
3 |
41 |
South Carolina |
21.30 |
38 |
-3 |
|
43 |
Tennessee |
20.53 |
45 |
2 |
42 |
Kentucky |
21.07 |
43 |
1 |
|
29 |
Texas |
24.37 |
29 |
0 |
43 |
Hawaii |
20.53 |
34 |
-9 |
|
12 |
Utah |
29.07 |
5 |
-7 |
43 |
Tennessee |
20.53 |
45 |
2 |
|
18 |
Vermont |
27.63 |
15 |
-3 |
45 |
West Virginia |
20.14 |
48 |
3 |
|
4 |
Virginia |
31.47 |
4 |
0 |
46 |
New Mexico |
19.93 |
47 |
1 |
|
21 |
Washington |
25.56 |
18 |
-3 |
47 |
Arkansas |
18.88 |
44 |
-3 |
|
45 |
West Virginia |
20.14 |
48 |
3 |
48 |
Alabama |
18.12 |
46 |
-2 |
|
11 |
Wisconsin |
29.37 |
8 |
-3 |
49 |
Louisiana |
17.02 |
49 |
0 |
|
8 |
Wyoming |
29.72 |
12 |
4 |
50 |
Mississippi |
17.00 |
50 |
0 |
METHODOLOGY: To determine a state's "Livability Rating," each state's rankings for 43 categories were averaged. The scale is 1 to 50, the higher the number, the better. Data used are for the most recent year in which comparable numbers are available from most states. All factors were given equal weight. States with no data available for a given category were ranked based only on the remaining factors. In our book, data are listed from highest to lowest. However, for purposes of this award, we inverted rankings for those factors we determined to be "positive." Thus the state with the highest median income in the book (ranking 1st) would be given a number 50 ranking for this award.